If that Equipment was attached to a Goblin, gain control of that creature.
Posted By:
MrPink343
(12/8/2010 5:19:19 PM)
Its not that bad. Situational, yes, but not bad. In that situation, it does its job very well.
Posted By:
JFM2796
(9/3/2011 9:29:01 PM)
The Art/flavour text confllicts with the unattache effect that this card has.
Posted By:
Vedalken_Arbiter
(7/23/2010 6:11:06 PM)
It never crossed Gwark's mind to just let go.
Posted By:
liir007
(8/21/2009 3:24:39 PM)
Razor Golem is hidden in the art. Well, I don't know if it's intentional, but it sure looks like one.
And yeah, the art/flavour text clashes with ability. Would be kinda cool if the equipment wouldnt be unattached. You could still just pay the equip cost (as you would have to do anyways) to attach it to your guy.
Posted By:
Dumedag
(10/27/2011 2:28:14 PM)
steal a skullclamp =D
Posted By:
enjoy
(1/20/2013 8:33:30 AM)
Great way to deal with a Batterskull as long as you play it when your opponent doesn't have mana up to bounce it.
Posted By:
absreim
(9/6/2013 8:31:58 AM)
That goblin's all like "FOR MIDGARD!"
Posted By:
Legendxp
(3/21/2014 6:31:07 PM)