Should read:
2WW
sorcery
You win the game if your opponent is playing mono red. Also you are a D-bag.
Posted By:
Mudbutt_on
(12/16/2010 10:51:48 PM)
Not really. It prevents players from playing any red spells unless they have non-basic lands or artifacts that can produce red mana. That doesn't seem silly to me. And you can just keep paying for it to stay out. If your opponent is playing heavy red with mostly basic lands, they're screwed.
Posted By:
lukemol
(2/11/2010 12:27:03 AM)
Don't forget, at the time this card was printed, the only non basic lands were the original duel lands, which had two basic land types. So if you were playing heavy red, even your non-basic lands would have been mountains.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(2/12/2010 2:43:35 AM)
Idk, maybe this does something hilarious against Blood Moon or Magus of the Moon, but other than that is seems kind of silly.
Posted By:
TheFrostReaper
(5/13/2009 10:13:52 PM)
Old school anti-red, this could also combo well with Sunglasses of Urza in a R/W deck
Posted By:
Ibn_Shisha
(6/22/2010 7:21:55 PM)
Very harsh if your opponent is playing mono-red
Would be fairer if it had a cumulative upkeep cost or something
Posted By:
Moleland
(3/9/2011 8:57:02 AM)
Poor Koth/Valakut. =(
Posted By:
Lyoncet
(3/19/2011 12:38:48 AM)
In A/B/U this wasn't bad because all burn worked with Mox Ruby, but in R and 4 this was ridiculous.
Posted By:
tavaritz
(4/20/2011 10:56:07 AM)
Lazy mountains....
Posted By:
car2n
(2/11/2014 10:57:09 AM)
BUUUUUUUUUULLSHEEEEEEEEEEEEEETT
Posted By:
Goatllama
(4/14/2014 11:42:58 PM)