Ignoring Twincast shenanigans, why wouldn't you just always set X to zero? Actually, I just realized that you can totally cast this without paying its mana cost, and it's NOT useless.
Posted By:
Tynansdtm
(11/10/2012 12:56:05 AM)
Yes, X can be 0, but unless I am missing the point, why would you want to? You still have to pay 1 colorless per damage prevented, so I don't see the point.
Posted By:
Bbone37
(7/25/2013 10:16:55 AM)
Angel nuidity.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(3/4/2010 6:59:48 AM)
shame its so damn ugly
Posted By:
Szentekkel
(12/18/2011 11:00:59 AM)
Should be a Tribal instant.
Posted By:
Ibn_Shisha
(6/13/2013 8:21:01 AM)
@Bbone37:
Cause if X is 0 then you know how much mana to spend on preventing damage and how much you have left for other spells.
It's a pretty decent card this. Tones of possibilities.
And featuring (not so) gracious angel nudity!
Posted By:
MillingMaster
(5/26/2014 12:35:29 AM)