On today's episode of "Good Cards": Not this.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(11/17/2010 9:16:26 PM)
On the other hand, the art is top notch! :)
Posted By:
danegator
(8/31/2010 1:44:19 PM)
This is probably the worst dragon ever printed.
Posted By:
Mr_Hendry
(9/18/2009 10:58:39 PM)
Why is it white, anyway?
Posted By:
Tanaka348
(1/5/2010 5:44:12 PM)
Exalted Dragon does not have exalted...
Posted By:
Ideatog
(3/15/2010 9:55:22 PM)
Sucky card but great artwork.
Posted By:
TasPap
(9/14/2010 5:42:31 AM)
5/5 flier for six is never going to be bad... but with the printing of baneslayer angel, this card is best forgotten.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(12/5/2009 7:01:18 AM)
How exactly is this white? A "greedy", "vain" dragon that requires a sacrifice to be used offensively. Sounds black or red to me. Heck, I'd put it in green over white, the flying would at least be welcome there.
And don't blame this guy's current level of suckage on power creep, he was predated by the (nonstrictly) superior Pearl Dragon.
Posted By:
TPmanW
(11/22/2010 10:45:56 PM)
5/5 for art and flavor text, 1/5 for its abilities. Average that out to 3/5.
Posted By:
SweetZombiJesus
(11/18/2010 8:22:44 AM)
Who would EVER want to use this card??? (Even when it was originally printed!!!) Maybe if it were a 10/10 with flying AND trample, it would be worth losing a precious land for every turn that you attack with it.
And I agree, TPmanW. There is nothing "white" about this dragon. It definitely seems black, or red, to me, as well.
Posted By:
KnightLord77
(2/7/2011 5:45:07 AM)