x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.487 / 5  (38 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
According to the EDH RC, you can make a rats deck.

Posted By: ir0nwood (12/31/2010 8:37:52 AM)


112.6m in the Rulebook guise! 112.6m! YOU CAN PLAY RATS EDH!!!!!
Posted By: Shadoflaam (11/1/2011 1:30:43 PM)


Nobody cares about your opinion MasterOfEtherium. You are a gibbering idiot with an at best flimsy grasp of the concepts of this game. Not to mention your goddawful posts. Good god, where do you get your expressions? An 80s sitcom? The thing with the caps is so freaking annoying. Just get someone educated to type your posts.
Posted By: allmighty_abacus (7/27/2010 6:01:28 PM)


As far as I'm aware, WotC doesn't set the ruled on EDH... having 50 of these in an EDH might might be fun, but it'd go against the spirit of EDH (being unpredictable and varied every game)
Posted By: Kurraga (5/9/2010 8:04:47 AM)


The formats make it pretty clear what you can and can't do. 100 card singleton (and EDH by extension) is 100 single cards; there's no room for confusion there.

Furthermore, Pauper decks are built with 0 rares and a maximum of 5 uncommons. Therefore you can have 5 relentless rats, but no more.

Its not that hard.
Posted By: Bandswithother (11/11/2010 3:42:02 PM)


Wizards, it's super lame that I can only play one of these in EDH. What's the number one rule in Magic? If the card disobeys the rules, follow the card! I mean, in formats where I can lose from having zero life, Platinum Angel says I can't, should I just follow the rules above the card and lose when I hit zero life anyway? It just seems to defeat the point of the card :/
Posted By: izzet_guild_mage (2/24/2010 7:29:17 AM)


At Izzet I Feel You But In Those Cases Just Follow Your Own Rules Bro Like Mty Casual Hommies We Say Screw Legendary Rule I Cant Play My Ajani Cuz I Allready Have One On The Filed Nah *** THAT LOL
Posted By: MasterOfEtherium (7/21/2010 1:05:47 PM)


Rulings are strangely dated. It claims that something talking about Commander is from 2004.
Posted By: NeoKoda (12/10/2011 9:49:52 PM)