Why does everyone hate Kamigawa so much? Okay, it's got some crap, but there are some very nice cards too.
Anyway, I don't see why you would want to use these guys rather than, say, Samurai Enforcers... but I don't think they deserve the worst rating of any Magic card. I mean, they're no Chimney Imp.
Posted By:
littlebeast
(2/11/2010 12:33:11 AM)
Just another overcosted Kamigawa card.
Posted By:
tankthebest
(1/9/2012 10:49:47 PM)
4.5/5. Broken beyond repair. Shame on Wizards.
Posted By:
SgtPepperjack
(8/14/2012 5:24:40 PM)
When I drafted BoK, I went 5-0 with a Samurai deck. A surprise 4/4 blocker is worth 6 mana in more cases than you'd think.
Posted By:
wackodraco
(10/11/2012 8:40:05 PM)
It's Flash Fox!
Posted By:
Earthdawn
(4/16/2013 11:16:47 AM)
Maybe as desperate limited filler...but a 3/3 (moonlighting as a 4/4 in combat) is really weak for 4WW. I know its a nice combat trick, but white has lots of cheaper and stronger tricks out there. More of Kamigawa block being terrible I guess.
Posted By:
Hawk_man
(12/4/2008 10:02:39 PM)
Would be an interesting card if it blocked an additional creature,
since then it could grow to 5/5 and get the potential to 2-for-1 your opponent.
I think it would still be acceptable if it simply had Bushido 2 instead.
But like that, it just costs too much.
It's particularly bad if you can't make use of it as a (stronger) surprise blocker.
Posted By:
Mode
(2/27/2013 1:27:43 AM)
@Mode: I'm pretty sure Bushido only activates once, no matter how many times one blocks or becomes blocked. Still, it would still be much better if it could block twice, though as it is, it's only mediocre.
Posted By:
Tiggurix
(2/4/2014 4:06:28 AM)