Sorry, Dark Depths. OH WAIT, THAT WAS YOUR WIN CONDITION? I HAD NO IDEA
Posted By:
ClockworkSwordfish
(12/2/2010 8:48:47 AM)
I have a friend that has a casual deck that runs absolutely no basic lands. This card makes him cry.
Posted By:
OrzhovGhostCouncil
(7/4/2010 3:04:05 PM)
Bye bye Valakut.
Posted By:
Exclaimer999
(3/16/2011 4:36:36 PM)
As Jacob Van Lunen points out, absolutely murders Tron decks that rely on Urza's lands for big mana shenanigans.
Posted By:
djflo
(4/5/2012 1:07:31 AM)
Great card for use in extended and legacy.
Posted By:
getz19
(2/18/2010 3:28:33 AM)
swordfish made me chuckle.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(3/21/2011 8:53:47 PM)
so many 5 star ratings
Posted By:
Purple_Shrimp
(10/22/2011 1:56:16 AM)
If I'm playing red I would not leave for a modern tournament without it.
Posted By:
good.beats.for.all
(8/30/2012 3:06:09 AM)
This is a great card, but it's strictly sideboard material unless you positively know they have multiple cards sitting in their library still. Often I have this in my hand, waiting to use it against a land. Half the time when I do, I exile the only copy they have anyway, or the other copies are already on the field.
Posted By:
igniteice
(3/13/2013 4:23:07 PM)
Dropped this guy turn 3 vs. a Valakut ramp build and watched my opponent just about break down. Totally neutered his deck. And people think I'm nuts when I have multiple win conditions in my decks.
Posted By:
Penguin_Master
(4/12/2011 5:36:21 PM)