This would be great, except for the "at random" part.
Otherwise, you could build a madness deck around it.
As it is, you are as likely to discard it as any other card, and then you somehow managed to play a 3-cost shock, which is honestly kind of offensive to burn everywhere.
Posted By:
NoobOfLore
(2/6/2011 2:50:41 PM)
Should deal 3 damage. Interesting effect though.
Posted By:
Ameisenmeister
(3/16/2011 3:29:38 PM)
this is the sort of Crazy fun that I want in Red.
Posted By:
Dalek9
(6/22/2009 10:20:39 PM)
Art reminds me of Rocket Launcher.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(1/15/2010 8:05:49 PM)
massively inefficienty mechanism for thoroughly mediocre effect? check!
ability that is normally a downside, could be an upside with the right condition, but as
worded is not as effective for the upside as it could be? check!
7 stars out of 0. because I can.
this card is pure gobby nutsness. real goblins, though violent, are not 'built' to organize themselves into the beautiful 3-turn kill decks that players force them into. I consider them to be playing goblins 'so right, they're wrong' because they use the kind of military tactics that win smart, which I believe come from white and blue mana. the opposites of red.
seriously, it makes no sense that a madness deck would want to be as well oiled a machine as an artifact combo deck. i say its BETTER for madness because of the 'random' clause.
discarding cards at random is the best effect to represent deciding to randomly go insane in a fight. you can't pick what kind of insanity you get like its a draft. that would be too ... (see all)
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(3/18/2011 8:24:33 PM)
Let this be a lesson to everyone: don't Comment Under The Influence.
Posted By:
luca_barelli
(8/30/2011 1:41:32 PM)
Hanabi means fireworks, or more literally, Fire flower. So this art could have been a bit flashier.
Posted By:
Vedalken_Arbiter
(8/19/2010 9:44:53 AM)
This will go great with my madness deck.
Posted By:
Peechiz
(10/1/2009 11:19:45 PM)
why? you pay three, then maybe get to discard something with madness? just splash for wild mongrel
Posted By:
Omenchild
(12/31/2009 9:55:20 PM)
The problem with this in a madness deck is not that it discards a card at random (though that is bad), it's that it costs 3 mana, so you need 3 mana on top of whatever madness cost you need to pay. Reckless Wurm for 6 mana? No thanks. Give me Wild Mongrel any day.
Posted By:
ScissorsLizard
(10/6/2011 12:46:02 AM)