Yeah, it's boring as hell but back in 9th when it was in tutorial decks it was one of the first cards new magic players saw. And it's not explicitly bad, it's just not good. I gave it a 2.5/5 for being extraordinarily average.
Posted By:
Joseph_Leito
(2/21/2010 10:33:00 AM)
He's a soldier, that jsutifies being a 2/2 for 2
Posted By:
Thrull_Champion
(4/15/2010 10:21:20 AM)
It gets a bad rating because there are a couple dozen other 2/2 for 2cc that actually do something useful.
Posted By:
pumaman83
(5/25/2009 9:45:19 PM)
Why do people give cards like this such bad ratings? Sure, it isn't anything spectacular, but it's a solid 2/2 for 2cc.
Posted By:
Elysiume
(5/11/2009 4:27:18 PM)
Yaawn: White Knight, Silver Knight, Leonin Skyhunter etc.
Posted By:
Econael
(1/18/2010 3:01:06 PM)
Strictly better than Silvercoat Lion due to creature types, but I guess that's why Silvercoat Lion got printed in the first place.
Posted By:
Thaxan_Number_14
(7/15/2009 5:17:38 PM)
Grizzly Bears would kick this guy's ass.
Posted By:
GruesomeGoo
(12/29/2009 8:35:17 PM)
This card defines meh.
2.5/5
Posted By:
WateryMind
(7/6/2011 9:00:24 PM)
come on guys, what's not to like about a glory seeker? Every good army needs a glory seeker!
Posted By:
Burningsickle
(11/25/2013 3:44:17 PM)