I've wrecked a token deck with it, maybe we've met online.
Posted By:
Tommy9898
(1/5/2011 9:55:03 PM)
This card wrecked my token deck :(
Posted By:
Mana
(11/4/2009 8:15:56 PM)
@ Tommy9898, Mana:
Reunited and it feels so gooood.
Posted By:
Polychromatic
(5/14/2011 12:06:45 AM)
As always, Radience has two major problems:
1. Enormous potential for backfire.
2. Inability to deal with artifacts.
This card gets a third problem:
3. Inability to do anything other than waste weenies.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/20/2012 9:55:05 AM)
Dzzt!
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(7/15/2012 11:30:21 AM)
Odd, I guess White gave Red a go on its orbital laser. Looks like Red kinda wasted the shot though...
Posted By:
Villainous1
(2/14/2013 8:49:06 AM)
I think that even at 
less this card would be far more practical. 
less would be ideal though. In any case the art is great. Who doesn't love lasers?
Posted By:
JamminTacoStand
(1/13/2011 3:36:59 PM)
Even then, its still not worth having to pay five just to kill only small creatures.
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(6/27/2009 7:16:37 PM)
OK, it only works when your deck has different colors then your opponent's deck.
Posted By:
Aboleth11
(3/15/2009 11:45:46 AM)
I think the pros and cons of radiance equal out when you compare this with other sweepers. Thus it should be flat out compared with sweepers.
In those comparisons, a sweeper for 2 damage which costs 5 doesn't do well.
Posted By:
Baconradar
(10/20/2011 4:31:12 AM)