x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.895 / 5  (62 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
Conversion still hits it. That's about the only negative I can think of.
Posted By: Ibn_Shisha (6/9/2013 3:33:29 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's not deceptive. The dual-lands aren't a big secret you happened to stumble upon.

They're good. We know.
Posted By: Kirbster (1/24/2011 8:20:36 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


GOOD Land
Posted By: MasterOfEtherium (6/27/2011 9:54:30 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


No they're BAD! See? Bad-lands!

What can you really say about the original dual lands that hasn't already been said? They eat newer lands for breakfast.
Posted By: Ideatog (4/5/2011 5:53:16 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Deceptively good!
Posted By: zombietomb (2/1/2010 12:38:16 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This cycle ensures legacy will be exclusive to wallet warriors. Theres always RDW though.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (8/25/2013 7:04:32 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's not a badland, just misunderstood.
Posted By: car2n (4/8/2014 6:04:36 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Pros:
Taps for two colors
Counts as 2 land types
Doesn't ping you for tapping it
Enters the battlefield untapped without shocking you

Cons:
Nonbasic target for land removal
Affected by spells and effects that would affect either type
F***ing expensive and rare.

Good/bad is subjective depending on which of these facts are important to how you will be playing.
Posted By: Drewskithelegend (5/29/2014 7:19:11 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0