Hey, leave him alone. Fluctuator, much like love, is blind.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(12/10/2011 11:04:55 PM)
Could've used a bit more...juice. Still, it's not overly terrible.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(9/3/2012 11:38:08 AM)
Eh, this guy isn't actually that terrible... I like the flexibility you get with cycling...
Posted By:
Anubisisking
(1/31/2011 2:34:01 PM)
Not as horrible as some serpents, but still keeping up the theme that serpents and serious decks don't mix.
Posted By:
Radagast
(10/13/2010 8:15:31 AM)
Really, a serpent that doesn't have major drawbacks? Yes! Finally a good serpent card . . . oh wait, its a 3/4 that costs five and its only ability is cycling. Uhg, nevermind.
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(6/24/2009 7:43:22 PM)
A card that reduces the mana costs of cards with cycling by their cycling costs would go a long way toward making many cycling cards playable. For example, this guy would cost {2U}. By the same token, that would also break the crap out of cards like Resounding Thunder.
Posted By:
DacenOctavio
(10/18/2012 9:50:56 PM)
@DacenOctavio: Resounding Thunder for R would be... Lightning Bolt. I get your point, though. Maybe something that gave all your spells madness would benefit cyclers more (in case anyone's wondering, check Ichor Slick to see how madness and cycling interact.
About this... It's a vanilla 3/4 with cycling. Relatively crappy even if you're in the Living Death bandwagon.
Posted By:
Lash_of_Dragonbreath
(4/22/2013 5:33:56 PM)
I love the art anyways.
Posted By:
Earthdawn
(6/18/2013 11:27:55 AM)