x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.913 / 5  (63 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
1234 >
Already tired of seeing innistrad cards that get reprinted during the current block...its already in standard, let it be in danger of cycling out before you try reprinting it... ****

Some people will be like "oh, its for drafts" and I just don't care. That's like 6 spots wasted on cards that could've been more exciting reprints. Leaving out staples like giant growth or autumn's veil for a card that's in standard already and will be for the duration of this reprint's existence in standard.

You still love confusing me with your bad decisions, don't you wizards...
Posted By: Vakyoom (7/7/2012 3:31:44 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@mrhardy12 Fetch-Lands aren't good enough to justify having 8 of them in a 60 card deck anyways, it would disrupt tempo too much. Even 4 is overkill. Even in a 5 color deck, you have Abundant Growth which is even better for color fixing even in only 2 colors and on top of that it's a cantrip. Maybe in a durdley 4 color control deck that doesn't use Green someone would be stupid enough want to use more then 4 and even that is a stretch. And even in singleton/commander/edh, what's wrong with 2 fetch lands? There is way more then one tutor, why can't there be more then one fetch land? Especially in a multi-colored 100 card deck.
Posted By: Ligerman30 (9/4/2012 7:12:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Combos well with Wild Defiance.
Posted By: Sanguineous (1/22/2013 10:28:58 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Does this count as combat damage?
Posted By: LordStryda (4/6/2013 9:46:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Remember when core sets had cards in them that weren't legal in standard already?
Posted By: omni8000 (4/8/2013 8:50:43 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Vakyoom says it all. Seriously, there are at LEAST two cards I've seen so far that were in the Innistrad block reprinted in M13 - Evolving Wilds and now this one. Seriously, WHY did they do that? I mean, even if it WOULD allow players to have 8 Basic Land-fetching cards instead of only 4, they should've at least put Terramorphic Expanse into this set instead of Evolving Wilds, and in M14 pick one or the other. Don't put a card that will be standard-legal past the next format change anyway INTO THE CORE SET THAT IS GOING AWAY AFTER THIS FORMAT. The ONLY way that would be a valid option is if they weren't going to release a Core Set every year, which they still are anyway. >.<

I are disappoint, Wizards.
Posted By: mrhardy12 (7/10/2012 12:39:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


A bit too situational for my liking. I mean, if you have a creature that can 'fight' an opponent's creature and win, then you probably didn't need to fight it in the first place. And if both of them die, you've just two-for-one'd yourself.
Posted By: Eternal_Blue (7/7/2012 3:13:19 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Cards like this make a championship mono-green deck very possible for standard. I will be the one to do it because I am a pro.
Posted By: Lotsofpoopy (9/4/2012 1:31:04 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Deathtouch and/or Stuffy Doll.
Posted By: Jhyrryl (1/20/2013 2:59:35 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It means: "Destroy target creature" for Green. Simply.
Posted By: Rodrigo_Rahmati (12/24/2012 2:10:24 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0