Alms Beast if you really want to have fun. Lifelink on another player's creature. Such a manipulable card. Also, True Conviction is finally not super ultra disgustingly OP.
Posted By:
milez0
(1/23/2013 8:56:17 PM)
Suddenly Alms Beast is playable and has a purpose - Being scary! I eat your dudes and you lose life :O. This and False Cure in a deck is just nuts. Think about it you gain life and stall until you draw either of those and then the deck suddenly becomes aggro life hate.
Posted By:
Quantumbiologist
(2/17/2013 5:36:42 AM)
Standard could use the HELL out of this right now!
Restoration Angel the Thragtusk, I FREAKIN' DARE YOU! NOW YOU DIE!!!
Posted By:
BegleOne
(3/8/2013 10:24:45 PM)
In my playgroup, Elixir of Immortality is used excessively for emergency lifegain.
Of course, nobody would like me anymore if I played this.
Posted By:
Innistrader
(12/8/2013 6:34:06 PM)
This is the card you replace the Terminates in your deck with when you're playing casual vs. a Felidar Sovereign Johnny.
Posted By:
Salient
(12/28/2013 11:44:43 PM)
This would be a fantastic sideboard card if it could hit lifelinkers. However, its inability to stop Lifelink makes this card only half as effective as it should be. Wizards should errata this or change the ruling, because this is just confusing and embarrassing.
Posted By:
troll_berserker
(2/12/2014 11:07:04 PM)
I'm listening to Slayer's Reign in Blood as we speak! Happy St. Patty's Day!
Posted By:
car2n
(3/17/2014 3:26:37 PM)
I'll add another: wtf are they thinking in the ruling?!? It's a blatant, unsupported exception of a single ability, reverse this clear mistake wotc.
Posted By:
Stuflames
(4/3/2014 1:09:57 PM)
The ruling makes no sense at all. Still an awesome card though. I love cards that get printed with no other real purpose than spite for a particular strategy.
Posted By:
questionflanger
(4/4/2014 7:54:10 PM)
check rulings: doesn't work with lifelink. ew.
Edit: strider24seven: thats for correction. didnt see that one.
Posted By:
O0oze
(5/12/2014 8:37:18 AM)