I would like to see an official ruling that clarifies the interaction between this card, Opalescence, and Humility. Perhaps something like "any player who plays these cards together immediately loses the game for being a huge jerk and wasting everyone's time."
Posted By:
achilleselbow
(6/28/2010 9:30:39 AM)
What happens when you use Scour and this? Does it mean you can also remove all lands?
Posted By:
BlueCorona
(5/27/2010 3:03:16 AM)
(Insert Broadway reference)
This is good for killing stuff since enchantment destruction is easy to come by and cheap (this plus Cleanfall, for example), but you need a pretty dedicated deck to do this effectively.
Posted By:
ClockworkSwordfish
(2/21/2010 10:46:13 AM)
Saw a couple of people mention opalesence and gust, remember that if it says all enchantments that means yours too, even if they have shroud because its not targetting. Primeval light and this card = win though. I have one in my deck, aura shards, and a token generator.
Posted By:
Donovan_Fabian
(9/15/2009 3:50:36 PM)
interesting card. Stupid name.
Posted By:
HuntedWumpusMustDie
(12/6/2009 11:04:12 PM)
This. Spring Cleaning. Win the clash. I've done it. In multiplayer.
Posted By:
Rainyday2012
(8/7/2009 5:43:51 PM)
Apparently, Opalescence and Humility weren't difficult enough ;)
Posted By:
Crandor
(5/9/2009 9:02:33 PM)
this + patrician's scorn = board sweep for five manna
Posted By:
retrovirus61
(10/19/2009 9:20:47 PM)
Zur the Enchanter. Think Diabolic Tutor every turn.
@ BlueCorona Not quite. You can remove every Island, OR every Mountain, but the cards you remove must have the same name.
Posted By:
greyhour
(10/9/2010 6:25:27 AM)
PUT DOWN THIS, THEN CAST TEMPEST OF LIGHTS.....!!!!!!
Posted By:
GrimGorgonBC
(7/29/2009 7:57:06 PM)