Why the hell would I want to know about treefolk mating habits?!
Posted By:
Saxophonist
(9/9/2009 6:08:54 PM)
It gets points for being unloved. And the weird flavor text.
Posted By:
ScissorsLizard
(10/23/2009 5:04:44 PM)
Color-shifted into white for M10...
And I dunno, whoever wrote that flavor text sounds excited. Molasses? That's just icky...
Posted By:
Champion_Kitsune
(3/10/2010 8:28:29 PM)
As in "Slow as molasses" At least they didn't name it "Ironwood Treefolk".
Posted By:
FragNutMK1
(3/22/2010 5:30:18 AM)
Underpowered by any standard, except for "back in the day" when it could block a Hill Giant, kill it, and surivve - yeah.
Half-baked artwork and loony flavor text. Not to be picky, but if Treefolk are trees, they should reproduce in the same way. This flavor text implies a more animal-like reproduction and... okay, ewwww... that's enough thought given to that?!
Posted By:
Radagast
(12/17/2010 12:21:45 PM)
The flavortext does, however, explain the sultry look (s)he is giving you.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(7/24/2011 6:55:45 AM)
Flavor text is so wrong.
Posted By:
JFM2796
(8/19/2011 12:11:37 PM)
Oh my God. I remember the guy. As a native French speaker, that card's name was unbelievably hard for me and my friends to pronounce back in the day. Ah! memories. Makes your deck greener, I suppose. 2/5 for the flashback.
Posted By:
Carnophage_4ever
(8/12/2010 10:31:02 PM)
One of the more interesting pieces of flavor text ever printed. This is a very sub-par creature on average...if only it had 1 more point of power...
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(7/1/2009 2:48:02 PM)
Five points for bizarre flavor, terrible art and under-appreciated-ness.
Posted By:
Motorival
(1/16/2010 10:33:22 PM)