Strictly better then Sea Serpent.
Posted By:
GruesomeGoo
(12/30/2009 11:51:48 AM)
The flavor text succinctly describes how stupid, backwards, and retarded this card is.
The card goes against the idea of walls (High toughness for less cost) as well as a decent creature (More P/T for less mana).
Posted By:
Zeofar
(10/15/2009 9:33:01 PM)
Meh, not a very good card becasue it's over-priced. I can't help thinking that Wizards are saying "Looks! Now it has Defender," *plays a land* "and now it does not!" as if it's ment to be imporessive.
But the art is nice.
2.0
Posted By:
PaladinOfSunhome
(2/4/2010 2:29:12 PM)
sure, if you want to pay 6 for defender...
Posted By:
metalworker
(10/6/2009 10:38:52 AM)
You KNOW you want to pay six mana for a 5/5 that can only attack some of the time...
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(1/14/2010 7:41:12 AM)
What a shiddy card. If it had been maybe a three CMC, it may have been worth playing.
Posted By:
StreamHopper
(11/1/2009 7:40:58 AM)
Man, Wizards keeps finding new ways of having big blue creatures suck.
Posted By:
reapersaurus
(4/4/2010 10:35:51 AM)
This badly wants shroud. It sucks otherwise.
Posted By:
KingRusty
(12/12/2010 11:40:05 AM)
usable with moonvolk
Posted By:
Imperialstonedragon
(3/24/2011 2:05:48 PM)
This guy is some nice tech against your friends that like to force your creatures to attack.
Posted By:
Earthdawn
(4/16/2013 7:20:09 AM)