It should cost (W)(U).
Posted By:
Th3_Dark_On3
(5/1/2009 4:10:52 PM)
Imagine if instead of the "remove if targeted" effect, it said EXALTED.
Posted By:
Swiftgamer18
(8/10/2009 2:15:14 PM)
WHAT THE HELL 
Posted By:
pizzasnail
(9/15/2010 5:30:46 PM)
All in all, I would have prefered the exile effect have been replaced with "Can't activate activated abilities."
...
And perhaps extended to all permanents. That'd be cruel, though.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/22/2012 9:41:36 AM)
Just another version of Pacifism.... every block the same procedure. B.O.R.I.N.G.!!!
Posted By:
Cheza
(5/24/2009 4:04:02 PM)
this card is good and all but there is something unclear to me, lets say someone puts this on your creature (obviously) and than you throw a disenchant on it, now the question is does the creature die as well? because really you didnt target the creature but you did target the enchantment that is on the creature so what is the end result of this? does the crystallization die, or both?
Posted By:
PoopyGoo
(6/27/2009 10:03:13 AM)
Can I devour one of my creature cards that was crystallized and still get a +1/+1 for that creature?
Posted By:
mrpaul1112
(6/28/2009 10:32:02 AM)
If the creature plays its own ability, like a tap abillity, does it die?
Posted By:
Demonic_Angel13
(12/19/2009 7:04:55 PM)
I have a Question. If u used this card on an enemy creature, and then u used aura finesse to move crystallization to another creature, does the first creature get removed from the game??? would b fun if it worked!
Posted By:
BearJew
(6/15/2010 5:08:54 AM)
This card would be nice in a W/G aura deck, in place of a Pacifism.
Posted By:
Fleetfiend
(10/24/2011 11:08:33 AM)