x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.124 / 5  (266 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
<<  45678 > >>
Mtg is in a vicious circle of Sick removal - Sick fatties - Some more sick removal - Some sick fatties WITH shroud or INDESTRUCTIBLE - More sick removal that ignores indestructibility - The Eldrazi - what's next..?
When is this going to stop? :(
Posted By: DespisedIcon (8/5/2010 1:25:42 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Good bye, Avatar or Might.
Posted By: LeoKula (11/12/2009 10:35:55 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


cool card, bad art
Posted By: madformedusa (11/14/2009 5:19:20 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


6 mana for an 8/8 trample that cant be countered? red's having a hard enough time just pumping out a 5/5 flyer for 6 mana let alone uncountable or anything else

if this isnt signs of power creep, i dont know what is lol, this card seems insane to me, especially for a rare, mono green is looking strong
Posted By: raadface (2/28/2011 4:46:23 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Green has a high level creature type Angel/Demon/Dragon its Elemental and i think blue is getting the Sphinx.
Posted By: Alan13 (3/8/2011 8:44:59 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


How is this a 50 cent card? MTG has gotten so jaded from when I started playing back in the late 90s during the Urza Block. If this thing came out with that set, it probably would've garnered a $10 price tag and would've been considered the defining fatty of any of the three urza block sets. I take nearly a decade long magic hiatus, and come back to see this thing priced at 43 cents on blackborder.com.
Posted By: sancrosact (6/17/2010 7:04:18 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I think this is a pretty good example of the run away train that Wizard's R&D has become. I'm not going to say "power creep" because it is so over quoted that the term has lost it's meaning. I mean the battle between removal vs creatures that Magic has become.

If you don't believe me, look at the older removal spells. Slow, costly, and/or restricted. This is why older creatures could afford to be worse for their cost. They would stick around a lot longer. Or they would be hit with more pseudo-removal and could be recovered.

Now we have Doom Blade and it's 5+ cousins that all put Terror to shame. Even Green has unrestricted removal (which was next to unheard of, especially to hit creatures, without huge mana costs) plus a metric ton of pure flying hate.

So how does Wizards make the cost of casting a creature in this environ... (see all)
Posted By: OmegaSerris (12/7/2011 3:11:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


and i agree with Eggroll.
blue has been so shunned by wizards its frightening to think about what green might become next...
Posted By: kittyspit (11/13/2009 1:02:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


While spells have gotten weaker over time, creatures have definitely gotten better. This vs the old Force of Nature is a pretty amazing shift...and FoN was already pretty fearsome if you didn't have an answer immediately.
Posted By: Nighthawk42 (10/5/2009 3:14:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Madformedusa, if you didn't notice, Naturalize doesn't remove creatures and Acidic slime is 5CMC and can be evaded or removed in regards to keeping creatures safe.

Although I don't want to jump to conclusions, I tend to agree the anti-blue aspect of this card is pretty crazy. What could blue answer this with?

EDIT: Mindbreak Trap, evidently.
Posted By: FogRaider (10/8/2009 12:01:12 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue