Why bother when you can have Control Magic?
Posted By:
Ideatog
(12/27/2009 10:07:35 PM)
As Auras go, this one is actually good
You gain a creature, they lose a creature for 5 mana.
Posted By:
OutlawD1
(10/8/2009 7:39:05 AM)
who actually thought ppl would wanna play this card when they have to look at THAT
@ NecroArTeest:
a pokemon or cute little bunny rabbit would've been better than this..this..ugghh, i can't even find the words to describe it. actually, i was thinking an appropriate picture for this card would be for a wizard like Jace or something to be dominating a dragon. that would have been just fine. but they had to put your girlfriend on it instead..:'(
Posted By:
kittyspit
(4/29/2010 1:35:05 PM)
Too expensive. I don't understand why they made a whole bunch of blue cards with high cost and a lot of drawbacks and too few benefits.
Posted By:
UltimaCenturion
(7/20/2009 9:11:01 PM)
Sorry boys, Control Magic wasn't over-priced to begin with and had a great name. This this is just another functional reprint whose casting cost is needlessly raised.
Posted By:
DyadyaIstvan
(7/11/2009 8:03:03 AM)
That artwork is straight up hideous.
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(7/11/2009 4:47:02 PM)
I like the re-brand. It's a strong effect in the right color at the right price, so the new iconic name feels like a good move. I just hate the art. What is that thing? Why would I want to control it's mind, anyway? I want to control something good. Something with wings and claws and stuff.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(7/11/2009 7:35:02 AM)
HaHa I Love This Card
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(7/14/2009 12:04:18 AM)
I think this card's art is hideous to make the Foil FNM promo art that much better. And damn, it is.
Posted By:
jhimbob
(9/10/2009 6:41:50 AM)
What happens when I cast a mind control on an opponent's creature and he uses mind control on that creature? T_T Confused
Posted By:
Rasan
(9/15/2009 2:12:05 PM)