this card sucks a 2/2 for two is unplayable its level up ability is dumb to you can spend almost all of your mana on the secant third forth fifth and sixth turn for a 4/4 with flying and vigilance wouldn't make more seance to put in a I dont no a sara angel? Which is not that great a card to begin with.
Posted By:
dragonking987
(9/9/2010 3:37:50 PM)
This card should be reprinted as "Knight of Cliffclaven" (Cheers reference). Overall, it's a decent card. I have seen better knights.
Posted By:
jsmith87
(6/15/2010 2:35:57 PM)
Expensive level cost is colorless.
Playable in a multicolor deck. Could have been 1W instead if it wasn't for that.
Posted By:
Ph1005
(7/11/2010 6:13:41 PM)
The Level Up cost is WAY too expensive! Paying 3 more mana to get Flying and 1 more point of Toughness is still too expensive, but tolerable because they're added permanently. But to pay NINE MORE MANA just to add Vigilance, 2 more points of Power, and 1 more point of Toughness??? Are they kidding??? You could put two or three other, far better creatures onto the battlefield for that amount! This card's Level Up abilities are virtually pointless unless you have Training Grounds.
And what if someone returns this card to your hand? You did all that Leveling Up for nothing.
Posted By:
KnightLord77
(3/17/2011 8:38:14 AM)
This is probably the best knight common, at least in Standard.
Posted By:
land_comment
(4/4/2011 4:50:47 PM)
Overshadowed by Leonin Skyhunter, not that it got much love in the first place.
Posted By:
Artan
(5/13/2011 1:36:01 PM)
It's a Serra Angel for 14 mana. I am so there!
Posted By:
dougpy
(7/28/2011 11:43:43 PM)
For a grand total of 
, you get...
Serra Angel?
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/19/2012 10:04:07 AM)
Weird that they put this in the same set, and at the same rarity, as the strictly inferior Glory Seeker.
Posted By:
wstonefi
(5/4/2012 9:37:38 PM)