redundant comments are redundant
Posted By:
Gezus82
(4/18/2010 11:29:40 AM)
Strictly better than Glory Seeker, that why it isn't a 0.5 of 5. The high toughness doesn*t create any special benefit, if it can*t kill anything. And it can't.... that's why it is a soldier and not a knight. I would have preferred a more defensive version with defender and maybe some sort of "soul warden"-ness. The ultimate level could have turned him into a non-defender.
Posted By:
Cheza
(5/2/2010 3:10:26 PM)
Over expensive level cost is overexpensive.
Posted By:
Vedalken_Arbiter
(4/15/2010 10:44:02 PM)
It's the Pillarfield Ox's fault he sucks.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(4/27/2010 1:46:34 AM)
I will play Intomitable Ancients straightway, don't need to say anything about this.
1.5/5
Posted By:
Duskdale_Wurm
(3/22/2011 1:53:32 AM)
deck with Twisted Image
Posted By:
Paleopaladin
(8/30/2011 12:01:57 AM)
How do people still not 'get' level up?
You're not supposed to have to get it maxed out, but you have the option to.
Riding a Pillarfield Ox.
Why is it not a knight?
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(9/17/2011 3:38:57 PM)
Level up is far, far to expensive, but when fully leveled up he's a surprisingly aggressive dude. Give 'im something to up his rather pitiful power, and you have a nice wall.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/19/2012 12:14:03 PM)
"I, Kira! L, Outrider!"
- Yagami Caveman
*Runs for cover from the bad joke police*
Posted By:
Mode
(8/27/2012 12:09:47 PM)
The flavor is that he starts out on foot and you have to pay {4} to get a Pillarfield Ox for him to ride. From there, you pay 12 more mana to get the ox to unleash its true power (err, toughness) for you.
Posted By:
EvilDarkVoid
(5/23/2014 12:17:08 PM)