How could you misspell 'FORK' into 'REVERBERATE' ?
Posted By:
siregar
(7/8/2010 12:42:31 PM)
Yo dawg, I heard you like Forks so I put a Reverberate in your M11 Booster so that you can copy instants while you copy instants...
Posted By:
Volcre
(7/9/2010 11:13:38 AM)
wish they'd named this card forks. then i could build a deck called "get forked" or "fork you"
Posted By:
flipsyalec
(10/25/2010 5:28:56 AM)
Yes, it is like fork and redirect, and we all get that. As a community can we move on now please?
Posted By:
snyden
(8/26/2010 12:48:29 PM)
Strictly less red than Fork
Posted By:
Corey_bayoudragonfly
(7/17/2011 4:24:52 PM)
Best moment for me was when my friend tried to Silence me.
Posted By:
Phatsavage
(7/22/2010 7:45:14 PM)
@Brixton: It's much less the red version of Twincast and more the functional reprint of Fork.
Ah, MTG of the 90s vs. MTG of the new millenium.
Posted By:
nammertime
(7/8/2010 3:50:24 PM)
@siregar
Reverberate has some technical differences from fork. Soooo that's how? =)
Posted By:
VirtueVsVice
(7/8/2010 6:14:06 PM)
yep because {R} needs MORE red aggro control cards.... 5/5 for having limitless options for destryoing anything....
Posted By:
sly92
(2/17/2011 3:07:44 PM)
While Fork was one of my favorite cards ever, removing the "copy is red" clause is a pretty cheezy way to get around the Reserve List reprint policy.
Will we see a Black Lotus in Scars that is the same except now a colored artifact? "Sunburst Lotus is all colors". Cheese.
Posted By:
underworlderZer0
(7/31/2010 11:40:17 PM)