So much prettier than fireball.
Posted By:
divine_exodus
(10/27/2010 5:33:40 PM)
Fireball, Banefire, Demonfire, Disintegrate, Ghitu Fire, Kaervek's Torch and Lava Burst are all better choices.
Posted By:
Test-Subject_217601
(11/11/2010 6:03:36 PM)
The "stronger" bonfire of the damned. Verse my creatureless deck, its a situational blaze. And it still wrecks face.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(11/25/2012 7:19:43 AM)
this is just about the dumbest flavor text...
Posted By:
badmofo
(8/4/2011 9:42:00 PM)
@Gaussgoat: Actually, a red player would feel bad on drawing this, because it'd be a reminder of how stupidly they constructed their deck.
It's not even a matter of rarity. Disintegrate and Fireball are both common or uncommon, depending on the set. Kaervek's Torch was a common. Lava Burst, uncommon. Even if you don't have any rares at all, 16 cards strictly better than this is enough for any deck.
Posted By:
sonorhC
(10/16/2011 11:00:41 PM)
@ dberry: when i want to use old school pumpable burn cards I use older and better ones, you know like fireball and disintegrate
Posted By:
omni8000
(5/10/2012 11:17:29 AM)
The baseline of X Burn.
Doesn't mean it's good, it means it's the baseline, which is fine. It's like Grizzly Bears: Sure, it's not a great card, especially not nowadays, but without it, so many things could not be.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(10/6/2012 8:35:12 PM)
Functional reprint
Posted By:
wholelottalove
(10/22/2012 9:45:32 AM)
Heh, it's nice to see they even have a card named after me ( www.blazemagic.com.au :)
Posted By:
BlaiseCarlisle
(11/27/2012 6:02:41 AM)
There are like five or six cards strictly better than this. Cards better than this existed for years before it was created, and they continued to print cards strictly better than this immediately after it, too. Why did they make this card? It's boring and pointlessly weak.
0.5/5 for being a card that should never have existed.
Posted By:
Aquillion
(5/12/2013 8:47:16 PM)