Cystbearer
x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.606 / 5  (90 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
<  1, 2, 3 >
Turn 1 forest, bird of paradise
turn 2 forest, cystbearer
turn 3 forest, canopy cover, groundswell,groundswell
gg
Report Abuse  
Posted By: rillaan (9/25/2010 11:48:08 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ willpell:

You forgot the EXTREMELY obvious WR equipt! :D
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Doom_Lich (10/22/2010 7:49:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Soon to be outclassed by Rot Wolf in Mirrodin Besieged, if the spoilers are correct.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: tcollins (1/20/2011 1:27:49 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


3 cmc for a 2/3 with infect and a strong creature type? I want 4 of these, and not just for my soon to be B/G infect deck (I call it Jungle Fever ^_^) but also for my beast deck
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Sir_Kaeru (9/24/2010 12:15:39 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Wow, not bad for an infect creature at all.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: demoninabottle (9/26/2010 10:51:13 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Good, cheap infect. Perfect.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Beastlygreen (10/9/2010 7:36:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Ugh, taste the infection? I can just imagine a big cyst popping in someone's mouth
Report Abuse  
Posted By: EvilCleavage (10/1/2010 8:45:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This will replace my Leatherback Baloth. Infect is just absurd
Report Abuse  
Posted By: stratoscythe (9/24/2010 1:07:23 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Not a fan of this card, but I recognize it's made to do a job and does that job well. However, it makes a convenient place for me to voice my biggest deckbuilding complaint about Scars. Maybe this is just me being weird, but it bugs the heck out of me when some color-pairs have an obvious build-around-me path and others don't. BG has Infect, UB has Poison Proliferate (also possible in GU but better suited to UB since you can use Ichor Rats and not even have to attack, plus there's Instill Infection and Trigon of Corruption to control creatures while you proliferate), WU has Venser187s.dec, and RG can run something revolving around artifact destruct and cards like Molder Beast (I'm very happy about him). But that leaves the other six color-pairs with no obvious direction. I think Wizards should mandatorily include at least one such path in each set, so players who identify primarily with a color-pair (or a single color, or even a triad - the latter can blend 2-3 color-pair p... (see all)
Report Abuse  
Posted By: willpell (10/17/2010 6:52:13 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ willpell

Yeah, Wizards needs to hand us 15 different decks for every set.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: chrishocker (12/14/2010 1:28:13 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue