Looks like Jace removal to me.
Posted By:
Removal
(2/13/2011 4:20:57 PM)
I'm wondering how this would work with clone. As I understand it, clone, being a copy of whatever creature, would, for the purposes of mitotic manipulation, be treated as if it's name was whatever it cloned, so a clone dragged up by mitotic manipulation would be useless. That sucks, and I believe it to be true, but I'd love to be corrected. Anyone?
Posted By:
Amnesigenic
(2/27/2011 1:50:59 PM)
Worst case scenario, you"ll get a land...
Posted By:
ajpinton
(2/27/2011 2:40:49 PM)
R.I.P. Retraced Image. This is proof enough that wizards will never give you your former glory. :'-(
Posted By:
thisisnotmyname
(4/3/2011 8:06:43 PM)
Worst case scenario you'll get a land....hmmm could be a fun concoction with Cloudpost/Glimmerpost/Vesuva.
Posted By:
SeiberTross
(4/19/2011 11:54:10 AM)
I want to play this when I have an Illusion token out.
Posted By:
blink182zombies
(7/1/2011 9:57:47 AM)
Who are you?
I was just about to ask the same question..
Posted By:
Tjokkie
(7/18/2011 8:25:52 AM)
@Fenizrael - what on earth are you talking about? If the card in your top 7 has the same name as a permanent, then obviously it does have to be a permanent already on the battlefield, as otherwise it's a permanent card or spell. Or are you trying to insinuate something else that I've missed?
In any case, 3 mana to duplicate something in blue isn't too bad at all. My mate runs it in a budget mono blue theft deck as mana ramp - a 3 mana Nature's Lore for an island isn't terrible when it's in a color that can rarely ever do that. And with a little library manipulation you can get some boss duplications with it.
Posted By:
JaxsonBateman
(9/3/2011 10:17:32 PM)
miotic-myr deck
propogator at least
myr battlesphere?
Posted By:
Guest1598841921
(9/16/2011 8:47:41 PM)
@craziecory
Almost, but it doesnt cast the card it puts it onto the battlefield, so your opponent can't counter the newly cast spell.
Posted By:
MindAblaze
(12/1/2011 3:16:48 PM)