Pretty darn efficient for the day, but I think they could have gotten away with static First Strike.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(7/5/2010 2:38:12 PM)
WHY CAN'T HE JUST HAVE FIRST STRIKE
Posted By:
allmighty_abacus
(11/25/2010 6:30:16 PM)
It's not that bad, but it's not very rare worthy either.
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(5/13/2010 9:12:43 AM)
This used to be a terror in standard. Sigh
Posted By:
Wulfsten
(7/3/2011 11:44:43 PM)
Pretty nice for a casual cat deck. 4/5
Posted By:
Qoid
(2/15/2011 4:59:00 PM)
Great for a casual cat deck.
Good power for its time period.
Before creature creep this was a 4/5 so imo it still is.
Posted By:
Baconradar
(10/5/2011 5:58:48 AM)
Great art, decent card.
Posted By:
Vorthosian
(6/26/2009 12:21:27 AM)
Come now.
A creature with CMC equal to its p/t is never that bad.
A creature with CMC equal to its p/t with cheap options is good.
3 1/2 at the least.
Posted By:
RafiqTheMiststalker
(4/19/2010 7:21:47 AM)
Yea, it's not bad. Ebony Treefolk from the same set, with a similar casting cost and base p/t is better though, I think.
Posted By:
achilleselbow
(4/20/2010 8:25:16 PM)
Just look at Blade Splicer! One could say it is a bit more efficient.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(12/2/2011 6:16:26 PM)