@Tiggurix. Tons? 12 out of 229 cards in this set are reprints. I don't think that would qualify as "tons".
Posted By:
Speednat
(5/4/2012 5:22:53 PM)
Ugh, Castle but...more flavorful, I guess. Hard to imagine a castle as an enchantment, anyway.
Posted By:
NeoKoda
(4/26/2012 5:41:36 PM)
Why couldn't they have simply reprinted castle? They already reprinted tonnes of other cards in this set without renaming them, so why not? On the other hand, if you should wish to, this does effectively allow one to have eight Castles in a single deck. Finally, it's interesting to note that this was printed functionally different from Castle; originally, Castle didn't allow creatures to gain its benefit when they were attacking, whereas this card already does that. Nonetheless, this seems like an unnecessary card to me, all in all. Nice illustration, at least, which, yet again, they could have simply used on a reprinted Castle.
@Speednat: It's still much more than is usual for noncore sets.
Posted By:
Tiggurix
(5/5/2012 6:17:44 AM)
*spits acid or whatever all over this card*
Posted By:
Sliver_Legion
(7/27/2012 2:19:09 PM)
"Why, hello there my good card. What are you doing out of Bant?"
Am I the only one to think that?
Posted By:
Recino
(5/20/2012 8:32:33 PM)
The name reminds me the hammerites from thief, and their devotion to the master builder.
Posted By:
Mark0z4
(5/3/2012 5:32:04 PM)
This would be a nice thing to have in an Exalted deck. :)
Posted By:
nopemx6
(7/16/2012 10:36:04 PM)
When this first came out I was pretty underwhelmed by the slightly buffed castle. However, as I look into exalt decks and see people running mutilate and bonfire, I'm actually thinking this card might be pretty solid with all those low toughness exalt creatures.
Posted By:
Lumovanis
(7/18/2012 4:00:07 PM)
Good synergy with exalted, letting the weaker creatures that are only there for the exalted mechanic get a bit of a boost.
Posted By:
shawnsullivan93
(9/2/2012 3:24:27 AM)