I wouldn't call it a good card, but it's far from terrible. Art is decent, ability can at least be useful, but costs way too much. would have worked perfectly fine Wizards.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(5/9/2012 9:46:52 AM)
Terribly overcosted, even for the additional 1/1 and flying. For the same CMC, you could get a Wolfir Silverheart or a Pathbreaker Wurm. Still, an evasive attacker and a chump blocker are passable limited fodder.
Posted By:
Trygon_Predator
(4/28/2012 9:17:49 AM)
I'm not so crazy about little miss preggers here, think I'll pass for any one of the actually good angels they printed.
Posted By:
brockdjwest
(4/26/2012 6:49:51 PM)
There's plenty of food in the provinces nowadays, apparently.
(I admit, the pregnancy joke was better, considering her ability)
Posted By:
TrueKitsonga
(4/29/2012 9:22:26 PM)
They could ahve at least made it a 4/4 that put 2 tokens into play. Then it would be usable, if not good.
Posted By:
swords_to_exile
(4/28/2012 9:51:56 PM)
@brockdjwest
Pregnant? nonsense!
But true, it's a bad card :D
Posted By:
Camu-Camu-Lemon
(4/26/2012 8:56:02 PM)
BAD CARD!
Posted By:
TheDementiaBat
(6/3/2012 1:02:29 PM)
An angel that's cute and isn't flashing skin everywhere? Blasphemy! Needs errata to demon.
Posted By:
Goatllama
(1/8/2013 9:00:42 AM)
Make it an uncommon (or rare) and have her bring three tokens to the field and then I'll play it.
Posted By:
Weevy
(3/23/2013 2:32:07 PM)