I am glad this is reprinted. A solid body with a solid ability. Can't go wrong with this.
Posted By:
Lotsofpoopy
(9/5/2012 3:36:44 PM)
Hey, it's...uh...that card! You know, that one that just came out, like, five months ago...yeah, that one...
Posted By:
SyntheticDreamer
(7/5/2012 9:55:21 PM)
We JUST saw this. Why is it that the awesome reprints are contaminated with bad ones from less than a year ago?
Posted By:
jsttu
(7/6/2012 4:39:17 AM)
2 for a vanilla 2/1 is not a good deal, Goblin Piker sucks even in goblin decks.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(7/8/2012 6:56:30 AM)
No reason to make such a controversial creature type... No reason to even go there at all. I have a hard enough time to explain to my church why I play a game called "Magic"... now its got creatures called devils....
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(9/6/2012 4:58:57 PM)
A reprint from a set just a few months old that's bad AND the rarity level is raised??
Total suckage.
Posted By:
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
(7/5/2012 7:25:38 PM)
Why.
Why.
Posted By:
Xilinoc
(7/5/2012 6:16:58 PM)
Ok, I get the anger over it being reprinted when its only a few months old, and yeah the uncommon inrease is really stupid. But WAS a really good card for draft, now not so much. But its still got room in a casual deck that needs artifact destruction. Only {R} to take out an artifact, and a goblin piker is a good deal at COMMON. Still not bad though, 4/5 for the card, but I rate it 3/5 for the stupidity of reprinting it already and increasing the rarity.
Posted By:
omni8000
(7/21/2012 11:14:00 AM)
This card kept popping up every time I open a Booster pack (because it was common). Hopefully it will turn out less often now.
Posted By:
mrkimi80
(7/20/2012 1:28:22 AM)
this is a decent card and i have ran it before maindeck in some rdw decks but common in dark ascension and uncommon in m13? WHY? it could be a uncommon card but there are so many dark ascension reprints in m13!
Posted By:
Harcos
(9/23/2012 7:54:54 PM)