Why is this beter than a canyon minotaur?
Posted By:
Hivis_of_the_Scale
(7/5/2012 4:52:07 PM)
Vanilla 3/3 for 3 is not constructed worthy in any color. Maybe table top casual, but you wouldn't bring this guy to a tournament anytime soon.
Since this system has proven to be to weak, I recommend every color gets centaur courser, and green gets a common 4/4 for 3.
Weak cards dont define formats, the strongest ones do. Heck even mirrodin and urza had its weak cards, but that didn't slow down the monstrosity that came from those blocks at all, did they?
Edit: @:DoragonShinzui
It would be a step in the correct direction, unless you are satisfied with the trashy 2/2 for 
we have been getting. I already knew about that card, and that is not the "junk card standard", this guy is. I understand magic needs weak cards, but I feel the power level on the lower end is too ridiculously bad.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(3/27/2013 2:25:24 AM)
@Shane: Do you read what you write? You just said that 3/3 for 3 isn't worthy for any color, so your solution is to give it to all colors?
Also, a 4/5 for 3 already exists in Green. It's called Leatherback Baloth.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(2/18/2013 5:33:14 PM)
CENTAUR TRIBAL. Needs to happen.
Posted By:
LordOfTheFlies87
(7/6/2012 6:11:35 PM)
Not strictly better than Trained Armodon for cards with chroma (i.e. Primalcrux). Even at that rate, I'd probably be playing Leatherback Baloth instead. So, just more often than not, situationally better.
Posted By:
raptorman333
(4/26/2013 10:50:00 AM)
Nothing wrong with it. Great way to determine the value of a vanilla creature: add power and toughness together, divide by two, rounding down if neccesary. If this is equal to the CMC, it's fine, less and it's bad, more and it's amazing. 4/5
Posted By:
KieranB
(2/8/2014 6:21:05 PM)