Too expensive. Make it four mana and give it instant.
Posted By:
majinara
(9/26/2012 12:25:51 AM)
Mehhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Posted By:
LordOfTheFlies87
(9/27/2012 9:38:38 PM)
I am a pro and I rated this card 5/5. Part of being a pro is seeing things in cards that others cannot see. Some see a card that is expensive. I see that 6 mana is a small price to pay to kill their best creature and discard a card from their hand. At this point in the game, the card they are most likely discarding is their bomb. 2 for 1-ing your opponents is how pros like me get so many victories.
Posted By:
Lotsofpoopy
(9/25/2012 11:44:59 PM)
I feel bad for the missionary. :(
Posted By:
Trygon_Predator
(9/26/2012 12:38:23 PM)
Wish he were less expensive. Then again, assassins are costly, and the-guild-which-shall-not-be-named needs recruits.
Posted By:
handoflazav_414
(1/6/2013 12:45:56 PM)
Removal is removal in limited. It doesn't matter what effects it has or what it costs. If this is pack 3 in RtR booster draft you'll be grabbing this higher than you'd think if you're not flooded with removal. (which never happens if the people you're playing with are good at all)
Posted By:
Biglonty
(5/22/2013 1:19:02 PM)
I LIKE that they're printing cards from a guild that isn't supposed to be in this set. I really do.
But why the hell doesn't it have the Dimir watermark? The original Ravnica sets had this same problem, and it carried over.
Posted By:
RAV0004
(8/24/2013 10:09:34 PM)
@ Ferlord
Darkness
Posted By:
Blitz_Hammer
(10/19/2013 8:03:24 PM)
For this price, I should get the whole hand.
Posted By:
purplebackpack89
(6/5/2014 10:19:55 AM)