Nice rack for someone who's head is on fire.
Posted By:
tcollins
(1/18/2011 8:22:20 PM)
Narcissism cost only G to activate, and hypochondria only W
Posted By:
zk3
(10/9/2010 12:56:14 PM)
The problem with this card is that WotC decided it had to have the same cost and activation cost as the other cards in it's cycle. This would be better at 1R, with R and a discard to activate. As to why they couldn't have it deal 2 damage, obviously you don't know how good Stormbind is.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(6/8/2010 1:48:38 AM)
I'd say the young lady pictured on this enchantment is-
*puts on sunglasses*
-pretty hot.
YEEEEEEAAAAH
Posted By:
Ideatog
(10/20/2011 12:12:44 AM)
Let's play some comparisons:
First, equipment. It's almost never their cast cost that decides their fate- a cheap equip cost makes lots of things playable. Think of the activation costs like Equip costs. If they are cheap enough, the top corner can be a little high, and the card still very good.
Second, you Stormbind example: A 3.5 cmc cost (is gold) card, with 
to turn things into Shocks. ~ one mana of a color for costing purposes, so in fact, 
is potentially reasonable to allow this to do 2, and that would guarantee it to be quite playable :) For 3.5 cmc, how about: 
, double commit to Red, 3cmc is a little high to cast for Red,
but the effect of Shock-spamming is very nice? I think there would be little issues printing it like that even back then, and certainly not now that we have Planeswalkers.
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(5/28/2012 11:48:07 PM)
Cleavage.
Posted By:
Crag-Hack
(6/22/2011 11:11:21 PM)
imo should deal 2 damage, and maybe even cost R to activate
Posted By:
Ganadote
(1/12/2010 8:40:08 PM)
Chandra!
Posted By:
Kamidii
(1/13/2011 5:55:19 PM)
Christina Hendricks.
Posted By:
WilloftheLisp
(6/14/2011 4:47:42 PM)
If this is Chandra before we know her, then this must be Jace
Posted By:
avimkv
(11/27/2012 10:25:54 AM)