There are no comments yet for this card.
While the text leads me to believe that those are roots, and the sliver is establishing some sort of manabond, it looks like it is relieving itself. I have no problems with different perspectives in art, but this looks a bit strange.
Posted By:
MasterOfCruelties
(7/9/2013 1:49:10 PM)
@SyntheticDreamer
I think you should mention that it is only strictly better than Gemhide Sliver when you are playing 1-on-1. You can play two-headed giant or other forms of multiply player games where you all play Sliver Tribal... Oh crap ... Ignore what I just said
Posted By:
Infernaldarkness
(7/10/2013 2:07:25 PM)
At least it's uncommon. This at common was lame.
I hated this when it was in Timespiral, and I can safely say, I'm gonna hate it now. What's worse is our sweepers are just plain bad right now, so you can't really punish people for overextending into this either.
Posted By:
Guest1381794618
(7/10/2013 11:13:44 PM)
Love the art, not so much the Sliver design. Still... if any card has gotten me close to accepting the 'new' Slivers, this is the one.
(And, yes, I understand the need to change the Sliver design perfectly well but like any die hard nerd I'm a cranky old grump who's allergic to change so just bear with me.)
Posted By:
Reishyn
(7/15/2013 4:46:44 PM)
"While the text leads me to believe that those are roots, and the sliver is establishing some sort of manabond, it looks like it is relieving itself. I have no problems with different perspectives in art, but this looks a bit strange. "
- MasterOfCruelties
I just can't unsee it now..
A scar in the face of older sliver decks, indeed..
Posted By:
Kariuko
(7/22/2013 9:04:24 AM)
I like how this card was drawn. The artist put a decent amount of effort into this picture.
It's just a shame Wizards went with a completely different art direction than before for Slivers. They were squiggly lines in Tempest, they were squiggly lines in Legions, they were squiggly lines in the Time Spiral block, and now they're trying to be Changelings.
I think Wizards should've at least included one multi-coloured legendary sliver in this set. I mean, are there going to be Slivers in Theros?
Posted By:
Ferlord
(7/9/2013 10:10:27 PM)
"Lets print Slivers that nothing like they used and completely obsolete all of our old all ready awesome slivers"
-- WotC
"Where is that noose"
-- True Sliver Player
Posted By:
master_biomancer
(7/9/2013 6:19:56 PM)
I know I'll draw some hate for this but I don't like what Wizards did with this new cycle of slivers for one reason: they unite the slivers to their controller and not to each other. Sharing abilities with all slivers regardless of the owner was part of what made slivers fun to play with (that and seeing how many abilities you could cram into a deck)! IDK, the art is okay, the change from "all slivers" to "slivers you control" ... epic fail. 0.5/5.
Posted By:
Beisman01
(9/29/2013 6:41:52 PM)
I'm a Vorthos. I'm a Vorthos WAY beyond anything else. I'm so much of a Vorthos that I really care and appreciate the work that goes into the Planeswalker Bio pages on the Mothership. *Karn Liberated actually has an awesome one) You know all those tabs that don't even ever have spoilers under them? I always click all of them to check for new Vorthos content. It wasn't even until Knowledge Pool came out that I became ANY sort of Johnny AT ALL. that card just kinda changed me. I suck at building decks unless they're bad silly decks like Knowledge Pool, okay?
I didn't mean on other Sliver posts to sound too much like a Complete Hater. I know that I must have seemed pretty blowhard. I just feel....Lost, and Rejected, and Abandoned to be a Vorthos these days.
When I started the game, it was sometime when my only Magic-playing friend had mostly Ravnica and Time Spiral stuff, and my first product was Xth Edition and Lorwyn. AT THAT TIME, this "Mending" thing was to me, one of the coolest ... (see all)
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(7/19/2013 12:12:28 AM)
Look out Gemhide Sliver, some stupid humanoid thing is trying to steal your gig!
Posted By:
Layk
(7/9/2013 7:37:01 PM)