If you were going to make a worse vanilla version of forbidden alchemy, you could have at least made it same number of cards not to mention instant speed.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(7/10/2013 6:10:17 AM)
This could have been 'look at the top 5 cards' and it wouldn't have been broken, or even good (maybe for reanimation at that point, as a replacement for forbidden alchemy).
As is, this card is hella-bad. Forbidden alchemy was even a common!
Posted By:
SAUS3
(7/12/2013 9:55:03 AM)
Skill. Tester. Literally serves no other purpose with Divination sitting a few cards away from it
Posted By:
ZephyrBlayze
(7/16/2013 10:03:52 AM)
What the hell Wizards? Even if you costed this at {1}{U} it would still feel pretty bad.
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(7/18/2013 9:42:04 PM)
Oh Ponder, how I miss you...
Posted By:
Totema
(7/19/2013 11:29:30 PM)
I would have never thought that glimpsing the future would be worse than Glimpsing the Unthinkable.
Posted By:
LeDvd
(7/22/2013 6:04:45 PM)
It's bad, but it's not 1 Star bad.
Posted By:
Nagoragama
(9/18/2013 6:26:31 PM)
It's the only glimpse that costs less than ten dollars.
Posted By:
DeviousPie
(9/29/2013 11:31:30 AM)
Sweet, another card for my pervert-themed deck.
Posted By:
Gishra
(10/8/2013 4:50:10 PM)
I am pretty sure they did this because Pauper is becoming so Paupular lol, that they were afraid of the impact reprinting Strategic Planning would have on the format along side all the other broken card draw spells that people use Ponder Brainstorm but they could have simply made it two mana but still uncommon, though by todays cards even at two this would suck as an uncommon, and at 1 mana would have been a tiny bit too good for its rarity, but still uncommon I think since you only get to keep one.
Posted By:
Quinn_Darkblade
(2/17/2014 11:11:33 PM)