I used to use this guy. How else could you kill a Juggernaut without losing your own creature?
Posted By:
nammertime
(12/12/2009 2:23:52 PM)
I think the artwork is alright, especially for a card back then from Alpha.
It provides a somewhat sinister atmosphere and suits to the power and toughness. I like the flavor of it.
And this artwork was used in every printing up to Classic Sixth Edition, which should actually proof that it wasn't that bad.
Posted By:
Mode
(11/22/2009 9:55:22 AM)
*** *** *** it annoys me that you can't autocard this because of the butthole in the cardname.
Posted By:
Goatllama
(8/16/2012 1:01:50 PM)
For an artifact creature, it's actually undercosted, not overcosted. 4/4s usually cost 6. You'll find two 4/5s that cost 7! You'll find 3/5s for 6! 4/6 would normally cost at least 7.
Posted By:
Sir_Bruce
(11/25/2009 4:28:59 AM)
Was this worth it back in the day? It's basically the reverse of Craw Wurm.
Posted By:
Zulp
(10/3/2009 6:06:48 PM)
my favorite flavour text of all time....ALL TIME!
Posted By:
ThaBishop
(6/17/2010 9:11:31 AM)
A generic artifact creature, overcosted...the only redeeming thing about this card is the flavor text...
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(7/1/2009 5:26:35 PM)
Artwork is so ugly! I agree that it is overcosted, and that the flavor text is somewhat amusing.
Posted By:
Archangelion
(8/2/2009 12:17:18 PM)
I first started playing during unlimited edition, and these guys were actually pretty good back then. of course compared to today's cards they're pretty much worthless.
Posted By:
Ryjhan
(10/6/2012 5:33:30 PM)
@Goatllama:
Obsi*** Golem
Posted By:
Ibn_Shisha
(6/8/2013 9:47:41 PM)