It's puking on the world....
Posted By:
pedrodyl
(11/21/2011 1:45:05 PM)
There should be a clause allowing the use of this Genju as a Commander. Bonus points for being in an all-enchantment deck.
Posted By:
Trygon_Predator
(4/26/2012 9:05:51 AM)
I totally use this guy as a Domain general, with the trade-off that my brother can use Elbris/Withengar. It's pretty fun actually.
Posted By:
Dr.Pingas
(5/27/2012 9:59:49 AM)
Wait, so if I activate this on an opponents land(s) and make them legandary, doesn't that force them to sac at least two of them? Or if I turn, say, three of them legendary, wouldn't they sac all three?
Posted By:
DeFectiveDeity
(10/30/2012 2:36:37 PM)
Does anybody have house rules allowing this guy as a commander for EDH? Just wondering.
Posted By:
MattLynn
(12/11/2012 4:29:45 PM)
question.can i put this a commander?
Posted By:
kronos1225
(8/7/2013 1:40:18 AM)
As far as I can tell, the text at the end stating it remains a land means that any ability that land has is not lost. My conclusion, inkmoth nexus.
Of course, I could be wrong, but a 9/13 Flying, Trample, Infect is worth being possibly wrong.
Posted By:
Megadog
(10/3/2013 5:08:53 PM)
A sorcery-proof black 8/12 with trample that returns to your hand if it's killed is pretty reasonable for 
.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(10/4/2013 12:36:51 AM)
I must say i find this card rather intriguing, everyone who says the whole *dies to X removal* well done geniuses, everything dies to removal hence the term - REMOVAL. your argument is invalid. this card is flavorful, a joy to watch and play and wonderful in all other aspects including replayability. 5/5
Posted By:
mutedexpressions2007
(11/16/2013 4:06:46 AM)
I like this card
Posted By:
aPimpNamedFlashback
(1/17/2014 1:15:53 PM)