Wizards employee 1: I have an idea! Let's reprint this thing, but make it like ten times better! Brilliant, right?
Wizards employee 2: Yeah. Now all we have to do is give it some Yu Gi Oh crap name. How's Tower of Calamities sound?
Wizard's employee 1: Yay we're so cool with our new $50 dollar cards.
Wizard's employee 2: ...Except for the fact that neither of these will cost even $5 because they're both mediocre.
Wizard's employee 1: Right...
Posted By:
mrd8888
(10/11/2010 12:35:22 PM)
Wow. To deal 4 damage, you need to pay sixteen mana. You know what you could do with sixteen mana? Well, with one less, you can play Emrakul. Or, you know what, you could cast four lightning bolts and four blightnings for a total of 24 damage. Plus the opponent would have to discard eight cards, which is generally more than, you know, your entire hand.
So, let's weigh the options here.
16 mana for 4 damage.
or
16 mana for 24 damage and their entire hand discarded.
Hmm....
Posted By:
ScepterofEternities
(11/7/2010 12:17:22 PM)
Strictly worse than Tower of Calamities.
Posted By:
LordAlvon
(11/22/2010 12:45:42 PM)
Yeah I Wanta A Ring Like That To Just Not One That Costs 8 Mana
Posted By:
inmypants22
(8/25/2009 6:30:32 PM)
worthless, outdated
Posted By:
brian_james
(8/27/2010 6:46:18 PM)
I've lost to this card. Annoying because it is not hard to find a better mana sinc when you have the Urzatron out.
Posted By:
kiseki
(3/15/2012 7:37:35 PM)
*cough* *cough* Tower Of Calamaties *cough* *cough*
Posted By:
Myrofkoth
(7/14/2012 9:26:01 AM)
It's a good thing they didn't put Aladdin's name in front of Flying Carpet or else it would've cost 6 mana with the activating ability being 4 instead of 2
Posted By:
Layk
(10/27/2012 3:04:34 AM)
This+March of the machines+Training grounds.
Simple. Still not incredibly useful, but would work sufficiently in a blue/artifact deck.
Posted By:
Solstice-273.15
(11/5/2012 12:25:33 PM)
"FISTBUMP! ...ahhh why does this always happen?"
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(11/18/2012 5:58:07 PM)