"Hey, check out my awesome 3mc instant burn spell for 4 dmg!"
-"Not bad, dude. I've got a pair of them myself called Flames of the Blood Hand and Flame Javelin."
"So do yours damage you for 2 like mine does?"
-"Uhhh...no. I'm not that dumb."
"...oh..."
Posted By:
redshoesrock
(6/19/2010 9:26:12 PM)
Izzet Mages Burn The Shit Out Of Other Shit -Martha Stewart
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(6/1/2009 9:12:45 PM)
Why on earth is this a rare? I can think of an easy way to get nine damage for three mana. It's called lightning bolt. Sure, it's flavorful, but it's still a crap card. 2/5
Posted By:
God_Of_The_Smurfs
(11/6/2010 10:24:38 AM)
this card really sucks.
Posted By:
dragonking987
(8/20/2010 8:19:52 PM)
Very, very Red, but some how not very good outside of its block. Slagstorm didn't exactly help matters, because it's better almost all the time.
In modern - I say run a few of each and let the good times roll!
Posted By:
Dream_Twist
(6/16/2012 9:02:09 PM)
i'd probably run a couple of these if i were to build a straight burn deck..
charot!
Posted By:
zenitramleirdag
(6/19/2012 1:15:52 AM)
-mander!
Posted By:
adrian.malacoda
(8/8/2012 3:42:29 AM)
Why is this rare? I know it is good, but it should be common.
Posted By:
battleofwits
(1/24/2013 7:43:09 AM)
@Admiral_Ferret
The extra {r} makes Chandra's Outrage less splashable than this, and in a red deck being able to play something on turn 3 rather than 4 can be a very large difference.
More importantly, Chandra's Outrage only targets creatures while this can hit players or creatures, another very large difference.
Posted By:
tankthebest
(5/20/2013 2:26:21 PM)
Guys, you haven't realized yet that this is the timeshifted version of psionic blast!
Posted By:
CamouFranky
(7/7/2013 9:36:39 PM)