It's uncommon so that fewer people have to own it
Posted By:
shapcal
(11/6/2011 7:16:41 PM)
This is a horrible card. But at least the Art is interesting.
Posted By:
El_Santo
(8/23/2009 1:23:40 AM)
This is pretty much terrible in every way except flavor. There are so many better options. And why is it uncommon?!
Posted By:
Notoriety
(7/20/2010 9:57:38 PM)
Yes, I agree. This would still be bad even at common (which it should have been).
Posted By:
148master
(3/13/2009 2:24:42 AM)
I love paying more mana and get a limitation^^
Posted By:
Sironos
(5/22/2010 12:05:10 PM)
This card is just terrible. Counterspell, Cancel, Convolute and so many more not only cost less, they also don't have much of a restriction on them.
Effect: 0.5/5.
Rarity: 0.5/5.
Artwork: 3/5.
Flavor text: 4/5.
Averaging it out, I gave this card a 2/5.
Posted By:
Bauble
(9/22/2009 10:02:20 AM)
Anybody else here up for voting this Worst Counterspell in the game?
Posted By:
PhantomdotEXE
(3/12/2009 4:27:54 PM)
bad. just give us Counterspell back. if at least it had an alternate cost, lie Daze or Force of Will...
Posted By:
bagilis
(8/26/2010 2:40:10 AM)
Who the hell made this an unc???!!?
Posted By:
Qazior
(7/7/2009 12:18:18 PM)
I don't know how this card wasn't a common for {1}{U}. Then it'd fit the Counterspell-with-a-restriction category Wizards always prints without totally sucking
Posted By:
sarroth
(6/28/2010 11:45:14 AM)