While it doesn't 'suck' it's not particularly great either
Posted By:
Latronis
(10/19/2009 9:04:43 PM)
Yeah, I've found these guys to be effective in a 
/
deck. Anything you can play without losing card advantage is worth considering, although this guy is a little weak. I don't think 3/3 would have been quite balanced either, however 2/3 seems reasonable...
Posted By:
bowlofgumbo
(10/26/2011 1:22:50 PM)
Possibly the epitome of 'meh'. Playable, but not exceptional -- especially compared with the other three-drop hybrid cards. 3/5
Posted By:
DarthMohawk1
(6/16/2010 10:14:23 PM)
Its the Merfolk Visionary except you pay and extra (G/U) for roids.
Posted By:
red_hq
(8/25/2009 10:27:10 PM)
It sucks. Compare it to, say, Boggart Ram-Gang of the same cycle. Why couldn't this have been a 3/3?
Posted By:
True_Mumin
(7/12/2009 5:49:19 AM)
could have had more stats, or flash, yes, flash would have been pretty fun, plus making this a decent creature.
Posted By:
Lueseto
(7/15/2012 5:07:52 PM)
should have been a 2/3 or had islandwalk
Posted By:
TheDonMega
(3/1/2011 2:22:42 PM)
In mono G/U or UG deck, it's 2 normal cards in one. Altogher, not very effective, yet in merfolk / wizard deck could find some use, i guess.
Posted By:
skew
(2/14/2010 5:22:49 AM)
Should have been a 2/3 and had a Brainstorm effect rather than a simple draw.
Posted By:
Wulfsten
(6/7/2011 7:52:36 PM)
I say it sucks. Why not just print a sorcery that said "put a 2/2 merfolk wizard token into play. Draw a card". That way, you can at least twincast it or something.
Posted By:
Dr.Pingas
(6/22/2011 11:23:01 PM)