This+lure=best creature in Legends (which really isn't saying much...)
Posted By:
D0UBLE_A
(11/30/2010 2:07:43 PM)
Bad. Your opponent will just not block it.
Posted By:
shadowf0x
(7/23/2009 11:57:13 AM)
Interesting misprint, but as shadowfix said, no one will block him, unless you use the usual tricks...
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(11/24/2009 10:40:51 PM)
Wonderfully overcosted, although the rampage value is high enough to be fun, in theory.
If he only cost 2RR, I could justify it, but at 2RRR, nah... what is with poor red creatures costing 5 mana?
Posted By:
Radagast
(9/15/2012 9:19:08 AM)
Wait...did they actually mispell the card in the printed version? Not sure.
Posted By:
Arachibutyrophobia
(9/28/2009 12:31:05 PM)
This used to be a 'Kilrathi', right?
Posted By:
Hanksingle
(8/25/2011 9:53:51 AM)
actually your oponent will block him, with a 4/4 killing him easily.
rampage only gives him +3/+3 for each creature AFTER the first one that blocks him, meaning if they block with just one creature he is still a 2/4.
rampage is one of the worst mechanics ever.
Posted By:
supershawn
(4/6/2011 1:45:42 PM)
great back in the day in a red/green. give him Lure+trample for a win con. Now, not so much
Posted By:
richardshort
(11/14/2011 4:59:54 PM)
revenge of the hunted on this when playing against tokens would make this card worth while. He has been waiting 15 years to do it , someone make it happen.
Posted By:
Mindbend
(12/9/2012 8:04:13 AM)
Why did Wizards errata this to the right name? Well, it's obvious, but WHY WIZARDS WHY?!?!?
Posted By:
SentientAndGodlike
(3/10/2012 1:23:23 PM)