An invasion weapon of ages past
Indeed. This was half-decent ten years ago, but now it just has no place in any environment. It's not even that great in limited, considering the rarity "upgrade".
Posted By:
Totema
(1/2/2013 12:12:05 PM)
This set sometimes seems like wizards asked all the designer's to be nostalgic and some of them also had alzheimer's.
"Hey guys. Remember Serra Avatar?"
"Aw yeah that was a sweet card. Hey, remember Phyrexian Hulk?"
"Um... We just reprinted that like a year ago..."
"We did not! Put it on the list! And make it uncommon, I don't think the meta-game is ready for a 5/4 6cmc vanilla artifact creature at common yet. "
Posted By:
Arachobia
(7/10/2012 3:30:28 AM)
Aaaaand back up to uncommon. Da fuq wizards?
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(8/18/2012 5:19:34 PM)
How about Stone Golem at common for the core set large artifact creature?
Posted By:
xenohedron
(12/22/2012 12:21:28 PM)
So it's got glistening oil in it, huh?
Funny how a metallic construct can't weaponize it as well as a converted elf can.
Posted By:
Ferlord
(3/31/2013 10:22:41 PM)
HULK SUCK!
Posted By:
Arachnos
(1/15/2013 12:59:08 PM)
6 mana is not too expensive a price to pay for a powerhouse artifact creature. Despite the naysayers, this guy is good.
Posted By:
Lotsofpoopy
(9/3/2012 11:04:48 PM)
We just saw this bucket of bolts, and i hated it every time i saw one. Why bring it back so soon? It still doesn't have the good flavor text, although the text it does have isn't bad exactly.
Posted By:
jsttu
(7/6/2012 4:00:48 AM)
HULK... Smelt.
Well, that was anticlimactic.
Posted By:
Keiya
(7/7/2012 12:25:42 AM)
Yet another card that I am baffled as to why they would reprint it.
Posted By:
Arcel
(7/10/2012 3:28:42 PM)