Battle of Wits
x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.210 / 5  (107 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
<< <  3, 4, 5, 6, 7 >
Is wizards trying to tell new players to make 200+ card decks
Report Abuse  
Posted By: ToastRecon (8/4/2012 3:43:41 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Do the class act and leave your BoW decks at home if playing with physical cards. As a bonus it will even improve your chances to do well in any given tournament.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Zenzei (8/11/2012 3:07:36 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This is actually quite ironic, even though it was obviously only reprinted for comical sense.
The rulebook states that a deck can be any size (60 cards min.), but you have to be able to shuffle your deck in your hands (or something like that)... clearly, with 200 cards that would be ... difficult to say the least.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Zaroganos (8/12/2012 7:35:36 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Hilarious card. Would probably be more hilarious to me if I hadn't pulled TWO of them in a sealed tournament.....

I kinda want to build a deck around this though. It would be awesome to win even one game with this card.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: rollinsclone (8/17/2012 9:19:55 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Hahaha out of all the things they could reprint for blue. It's actually kind of cool to see them bring back something less run-of-the-mill. It was definitely worth a laugh when this showed up in a draft pack.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Dragasm (8/17/2012 3:07:01 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Is there a reason this was reprinted other than to artificially raise the value of all other cards in the deck (by virtue of this card being basically a worthless rare)? I guess it's kinda funny, until you pull one in a draft.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: rzero (8/20/2012 3:33:55 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I like how the second ruling says your deck has to be able to be shuffled within a reasonable amount of time, I just imagined someone taking 10 minutes to shuffle a massive deck.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: 12fingerJIM (8/26/2012 8:55:43 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


could be fun but i wish they printed something more useful
Report Abuse  
Posted By: spartan7023 (9/3/2012 1:29:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


How is it I find out about cards like this while searching the underbelly of Gatherer? I need to try this card out at an FNM and see what happens.
One set, please!
Report Abuse  
Posted By: kor6sic6 (11/14/2012 8:23:10 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Just make a 300-card deck, run 4 of these.

Take that, Glimpse the Unthinkable!
Report Abuse  
Posted By: SubstantiaNigra (4/10/2013 12:59:36 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue