I thought that I came up with a cool combo for this card, but after staring at it for a while... Yeah, I got nothing.
Posted By:
Totema
(11/4/2013 9:18:23 PM)
One with nothing= one with one star
Posted By:
LunarAvenger
(12/15/2011 10:40:49 PM)
Hive Mind. But I'd still prefer the Pacts.
Posted By:
Rainyday2012
(7/27/2009 8:51:18 PM)
Awful... It's painful to just look at this card... and its rarity...
Posted By:
True_Mumin
(6/17/2009 1:25:02 PM)
This just gained a level, and is now better than power surge!
Posted By:
Ace_Rimmer
(6/10/2009 12:50:52 PM)
There are already a lot of easy ways to dump your hand if you need to, most of which provide some sort of benefit.
Posted By:
BrutalJim
(3/18/2010 4:13:18 AM)
The worst card I have ever seen.
Posted By:
True_Smog
(3/7/2010 9:08:29 AM)
Strictly better than storm crow.
Posted By:
faisjdas
(1/21/2010 9:25:32 PM)
The depressing thing is that this is still better than most of Kamigawa and Homelands.
Posted By:
Shadoflaam
(5/28/2011 6:26:39 PM)
A few years ago, when Kamigawa was out, I was excited to open a pack of the new expansion, Saviors. The commons were decent, and the uncommons were not horrible, but then I laid eyes on the rare. One With Nothing, i thought, well, that's an interesting name, and it's black for only one swamp! Let's see what it does! I read the text, and read it again. Are you kidding me? I thought. "Discard your hand." I sat there for ten minutes, grasping at straws for reasons why Wizards could have possibly printed this card. I came up short.
It's not even that this shouldn't be a rare, it simply shouldn't be a card! Yeah, you could say it would work in a madness or treshold deck for either turn one cheap spells or turn one threshold. Great. Turn two rolls around and you draw either a) a land, which you play then pass, or b) a useful nonland card which you can't even play because all you have is a swamp! I was so sad. 0.5/5
Posted By:
kakosguitar
(7/22/2009 4:38:24 PM)