Disfigure would have been better.
Posted By:
Hayw00d0909
(7/8/2011 8:43:06 PM)
I WANT to say "Strictly better than Vicious Hunger.",
But I know the actual definition of "strictly", and there are cards (albeit very few) that benefit/are benefited by Sorceries, and not Instants.
Posted By:
infernox10
(11/6/2011 1:30:43 AM)
Bloodthrist decks only.
Edit: Ah, creature. Damn. It could clear a blocker perhaps?
Posted By:
Deco_y
(7/7/2011 10:25:12 PM)
@nic56 I think Alucard's thirst would do much more than 2 damage.
Posted By:
Seifer447
(7/25/2011 8:18:35 AM)
good for bloodthirst? still meh
Posted By:
Kyzar
(7/7/2011 6:44:35 PM)
Terrible card. I could see it being useful with Precursor Golem, though.
Posted By:
Tempted_Johnny
(10/24/2011 8:52:54 PM)
If only it hit players, we could have something nearly as horrendously powerful as Lightning Helix in Standard.
Alas. ;_;
Posted By:
LupinXXXIV
(10/2/2011 3:06:50 AM)
Not completely useless. if you had Bloodchief Ascension out with mindcrank in a multigame, you can use it to kill your blistergrub and kill everyone at once. although there might be better alternatives to achieve that goal.
Posted By:
Adiaphoros
(10/17/2011 11:56:09 AM)
Lookin' pretty Alucard there, Sorin. And he's directly related to the guy who started vampirism on Innistrad. Instead of Grandpa Markov, let's just call him "Dracula." Sorin's also not too hot on what Dracula did and likes humans enough to give them a fighting chance. Sorin is totally Alucard.
I think it's funny.
Posted By:
MyrBattlecube
(1/29/2012 5:37:11 PM)
This card really is a champion in my deck. It deals with a healthy number of aggro creatures and gives me a little bit extra life to survive where I thrive, mid-late game.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(8/10/2013 12:04:04 PM)