Goblins do silly things, one of which is obviously putting their pet toads on their heads. Do you really need more of an explanation?
Posted By:
swordoath
(10/2/2009 3:01:30 AM)
This card would have been toeing the line of "decent" as an instant. The fact that it's a sorcery is kind of unnecessary.
Posted By:
NoobOfLore
(12/23/2011 2:47:52 AM)
+4/+4 for 4 is FAIR, it's not great but it's fair.
Retrace is the saving factor I guess, but still, run another card instead,
Ex. Unchecked Growth on Overbeing of Myth.
Posted By:
xNavarone
(1/12/2010 6:57:00 PM)
Did Don King name this card?
Posted By:
Enemy_Tricolor
(12/10/2010 10:51:53 PM)
@Buderus
I would kill for a land with Madness.
This card might be okay in Infect EDH? Ehhh... its limited, mostly because its overcosted for the recursive aspect (probably to prevent you from using it too many times a turn) and because it is a sorcery.
Actually, I'd quite like this card as an instant.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(11/28/2011 5:56:13 PM)
why is this goblin named after a Japanese Rock star?
Posted By:
Richochet_Shaman
(1/16/2012 7:29:44 PM)
this could be interesting for Madness or dredge decks, too!
Posted By:
Buderus
(6/15/2011 4:09:24 PM)
But why would you put a pet toad on your head in the first place?
Posted By:
JWolps
(8/30/2009 8:55:50 AM)
Should have granted trample.
Is otherwise somewhat disappointing.
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(6/1/2011 4:48:11 PM)
This is actually quite handy only after the first time you use it.
Posted By:
EnV
(11/8/2009 9:33:00 PM)