Well... more like "Pretty good Defender."
Maybe even "Moderately so-so Defender."
Posted By:
Kirbster
(7/25/2010 11:01:52 AM)
In most cases I'd rather play a Righteousness.
Posted By:
Tynansdtm
(4/2/2011 11:27:54 AM)
What a great defender!
Posted By:
dlgn
(5/9/2012 10:00:07 PM)
Mrredhatter is right, although it could serve as some weird pump spell for a Doran deck...
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(11/25/2009 7:47:11 PM)
This card's art is confusing (like a lot of Legends art). Why is there a merfolk on a White card?
Posted By:
UNBAN_SHAHRAZAD
(4/7/2010 3:07:33 PM)
Indestructible Aura is better, unless your trying to skirt temporary -1/-1 debuffs, then try Gerrard's Battle Cry.
Posted By:
mrredhatter
(10/9/2009 8:00:51 AM)
You guys have no idea what you're talking about. He's a "great" defender, it says so right in his name! How could you not run a "great" card?
Posted By:
faisjdas
(6/26/2010 8:06:49 PM)
...and gains Defender.
Posted By:
Gabriel422
(5/22/2011 2:58:34 AM)
The only good use I can think would be in a deck that runs Doran, the Siege Tower, then this could be quite useful to pump an unblocked attacker.
Posted By:
TreeTrunkMaster
(5/29/2011 9:59:32 AM)
Ironically, the biggest creatures are the ones that need the least protection from burn and combat damage.
As for the art, it wasn't til I noticed the hammerhead shark in the background and the bubbles coming out of the merfolk's mouth that I realized the entire thing is underwater. Decidedly un-white. I get the feeling Wizards used to just commission a big pile of generic fantasy art, and then match it up to whatever seemed like it might fit.
Posted By:
Avorna
(3/16/2013 12:07:43 AM)