I wish it were an instant, but a 3 damage shot to a creature for one mountain could be a difference maker in a game. Interesting flex option.
2.5/5
Posted By:
Gaussgoat
(1/7/2010 5:28:40 PM)
If only it was an instant. And costed 1 less. And had you sacrifice a creature instead of a land. Oh, hi there Fiery Conclusion.
Posted By:
JoeVector
(5/10/2010 8:15:43 PM)
So, compared to Flame Slash, you're paying a land and 2 mana more for an extra 1 damage.
The superior option seems clear.
Posted By:
Gelzo
(12/18/2010 2:21:27 AM)
If it could burn player it might be worth it but unless you are running some kinda crazy ramp madness deck 1 land seems like to much for 1 creature
Posted By:
Slavir
(9/28/2009 11:07:35 PM)
1 simple responce to Slavir... Baneslayer Angel, any deck that run's red, and not black, this card almost a must have sideboard card
Posted By:
SStopher
(9/30/2009 9:36:03 AM)
This card is good in a non-monored deck....Seismic Strike is better.
Posted By:
Bottari
(2/13/2010 5:57:21 PM)
I keep confusing the artwork with a better burn, searing blaze, so I'm giving it a 1.
Posted By:
Londonbrig0
(3/3/2011 6:48:31 PM)
Absolute fail. flame slash anyone?
Posted By:
Chaka-K-Rock
(8/20/2011 8:38:42 PM)
This card would be absolutely amazing if you can target a player. With some land gain, you'd be dealing 5 damage each turn without worrying being manascrewed.
Posted By:
Binaro
(11/30/2011 3:46:49 PM)
Should cost {0}
Posted By:
twiddleman12
(8/23/2012 7:05:04 PM)