because clearly it was time to make a new creature type that will probably never be printed outside of this block.
Posted By:
allmighty_abacus
(6/17/2010 9:15:15 PM)
Meh, imo it should have been able to unsummon any creature or have a cost of 
only.
Posted By:
Mode
(2/1/2010 6:57:37 AM)
@Doom_Lich: All the flavor text is italicized so when they want to use a word for emphasis they leave the text normal. Opposite of how we'd put an word in italics if we wanted to emphasize it.
Posted By:
Johnald
(8/26/2010 8:46:36 AM)
so this guy will never be able to touch a boob? poor one...
Posted By:
Imperialstonedragon
(3/24/2011 1:46:57 PM)
There was literally only one Surrakar per set in the block. Worst tribe ever.
Posted By:
Shadoflaam
(1/26/2012 12:19:10 PM)
If it put the card on top of the library than it might be passable, but still wizards got to keep up their c,rap quota.
Posted By:
Tommy9898
(2/21/2010 7:42:49 PM)
Good card for a common slot. Should be white though (bounce effect)... since white is reactive and blue is more proactive.
Posted By:
Cheza
(3/19/2010 10:46:32 AM)
Did anyone catch how the word don't in the flavor text isn't italicized? I'm wondering if that was intentional to emphasize the word.It does make this card rather unique though.
Posted By:
Doom_Lich
(6/6/2010 1:32:36 PM)
Not bad, can set up a nice combo if you're sitting on a counter spell of some kind.
3/5
Posted By:
Gaussgoat
(1/30/2010 9:23:02 PM)
2/5 for the card, one more point for the art.
Posted By:
MrPink343
(2/1/2010 12:32:48 PM)